If you live in a glass house, you won't start throwing stones. https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexandralevine/2023/12/20/stable-diffusion-child-sexual-abuse-mate

If you live in a glass house, you won't start throwing stones. https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexandralevine/2023/12/20/stable-diffusion-child-sexual-abuse-material-stanford-internet-observatory/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexandralevine/2023/12/20/stab... https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/your-air-force/2024/03/26/another-airman-probed-by-fbi-for-allegedly-leaking-intel-on-discord/ https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/your-air-force/2024/03/26... (i.e. as source of where LLMs get their classified data from) If you scrape a large enough part of the internet, you're naturally going to get extremely illegal training data that you won't effectively filter out. I guarantee you that at least a tiny bit of highly classified information was not filtered out of most LLM training data (it wasn't found during the filter step), and it's quite remarkable that this and the above revelations have not led to anyone being Subpoena'd or related in regards to it. So no, I think that folks will be literally the opposite of litigious on this issue. You want to play that game Zuck? Let's see what happens when I hire my researchers to find the dirt on your models dataset. We will see then who "settles out of court".