6 ms·
X caught blocking links to NPR, claiming the news site may be 'unsafe'
- r721 2y agoBack in 2023: >t.co is adding a five-second delay to some domains https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37130060 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37130060
- focusedone 2y agoI miss the old, funky Twitter. Back before the platform itself was actively trying to push people away from it. My Mastodon feed keeps improving. Maybe someday it'll get there.
- kylehotchkiss 2y agoI've just accepted this wonderful part of the internet is gone now. I tried getting into threads. It's just too heavy on Instagram's recommendation engine for my taste and wasn't doing a good job of helping me discover other throughtful people
- water9 2y ago[flagged]
- daghamm 2y agoAnd you know why this crap will continue? Because you guys will go on twitter to discuss this.
- LiquidSky 2y ago[flagged]
- blackeyeblitzar 2y agoDid you hold this view when Twitter censored journalists, banned presidents, and generally manipulated political speech in our society through a mass ~~moderation~~ censorship program?
- mandeepj 2y ago[flagged]
- The_Colonel 2y agoPersonally, I always thought it's a bad platform. In a perverse way I'm happy Musk took it over, hopefully it will die faster.
- blueflow 2y agoThe immense Schadenfreude when the "throw the baddies off the platform" people are now the "baddies" themselves. Hoisted by their own Petard.
- mcphage 2y agoYes—that’s what Twitter does, and that’s what we’re complaining about.
- timeon 2y agoAnd do you when it is happening now?
- blackeyeblitzar 2y agoThe title is misleading. X isn’t blocking NPR, but was displaying a warning about a potentially unsafe link on one article from NPR. I don’t see any evidence that there is something malicious here; it could just be some automation acting incorrectly. NPR did change the URL and title of the article, by the way, and I wonder if that triggered something. All that said, I am against any type of link blocking or warning functionality in the first place. This type of message is at best patronizing and at worst, censorship. Reddit does this, blocking links to various domains entirely or shadow banning submissions or comments with those links. I have seen their automation do this even in more nuanced ways, for example blocking certain Wikipedia links to articles that they’ve deemed unacceptable, instead of the whole domain. Other social media - including Twitter pre-acquisition, Meta, etc - all variously show such warnings from time to time or block certain domains entirely, both in submissions/posts and comments. In my experience, the blocking on those platforms (not warnings but outright blocks) has had a political bias towards the left and against moderate or right wing views across these platforms. I find it hypocritical that people who have supported over the top censorship for years are now so offended and upset when it happens on Twitter/X, even if it is accidental and not malicious. Regardless, I think Twitter/X does owe an explanation in such situations and should act quickly to correct it.
- snarkyturtle 2y agoI like NPR but I wonder why their slugs have that weird bit of code after the date/time "nx-s1-5092087" looks like a random string that might trigger some automated firewalls or checks
- grey-area 2y agoprobably a post id. the rest of the slug is for seo. For example this link works fine without slug. https://www.npr.org/2024/08/29/nx-s1-5092087 https://www.npr.org/2024/08/29/nx-s1-5092087 The problem is this specific url on twitter (probably due to mass reporting of the link by bots, or a manual ban).
- outlace 2y agoSummary of article: A single NPR link got automatically flagged by X to display a warning after NPR changed the URL for an unknown reason. It was reported to X who said it was a false positive and corrected it.
- BrianGragg 2y agoSeems like there are so many hit pieces out there anymore because they don't like someone or something. What happen to fact based reporting.... :(
- slg 2y agoThe details in the summary given by the previous poster were from the article. I don't know what distinction you think exists between a "hit piece" and "fact based reporting", but this article falls into the fact based reporting category.
- chucksta 2y agoIt's a non-story. Who needs to know X erroneously blocked 1 link to NPR? And what's with the title? >X caught blocking links to NPR, claiming the news site may be ‘unsafe’ Is it one link or many?
- slg 2y ago> Who needs to know X erroneously blocked 1 link to NPR? The appearance of a conflict of interest is a story. This appears to be a conflict of interest because a site is making it more difficult to read a negative story about a candidate endorsed by the company’s owner. > Is it one link or many? This is a rather pedantic complaint but multiple instances of the same link qualify as “links”. This is easier to see if you imagine them physically, multiple copies of the same book would be referred to as “books”.
- BrianGragg 2y agoI called it a hit piece because instead of saying users recently found a bug affecting 1 link to NPR. They say X "Caught" blocking links like it was something intentional and not an erroneous error. Any other site not connected to Elon with the same issue and it wouldn't of been writen I suspect.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- josefritzishere 2y agoI deleted my Twitter account overa year ago. I was not liking the changes. Stories like this only confirm my decison to be right.
- theanonymousone 2y agoCan someone explain to an outsider how "state funded" NPR is, if at all? Is it like BBC, DW, .. or more like CNN/FoxNews? And does its political stance change between governments?