8 ms·
You still agree to this EULA by using it: https://ollama.com/library/llama3.1/blobs/0ba8f0e314b4 https://ollama.com/library/llama3.1/blobs/0ba8f0e314b4 > By c
by SushiHippie 2y ago
You still agree to this EULA by using it:
https://ollama.com/library/llama3.1/blobs/0ba8f0e314b4 https://ollama.com/library/llama3.1/blobs/0ba8f0e314b4
> By clicking “I Accept” below or by using or distributing any portion or element of the Llama Materials,
you agree to be bound by this Agreement.
- bob1029 2y ago> You still agree to this EULA by using it I think my lawyer would have a few things to say about automatic legal agreements hidden somewhere in source control. Is the ollama project part of Meta? Is that what's going on here?
- regularfry 2y agoYou never see that agreement with `ollama run`. It's not even a shrink-wrap licence - there's no indication there's a restriction at all between requesting the model and the API receiving requests for it. This situation is probably going to end up with the ollama folks getting a slap on the wrist and told to implement some shrink-wrap wording but until then, nobody can be bound by that licence because Meta can't demonstrate that anyone has seen the offer.