2 ms·
This has gotta be the dumbest “debate” (at least in the USA). If you put something on the internet without protection (i.e. DRM), it is public. Enforcing a data
by overstay8930 2y ago
This has gotta be the dumbest “debate” (at least in the USA). If you put something on the internet without protection (i.e. DRM), it is public. Enforcing a data cartel like apple is doing has gotta be the absolute worse outcome, only the ultra rich can afford to get the good and correct information while the poor get whatever scraps they can get.
Apple drank the kool-aid and now has to deal with the fact that those bad faith arguments make no sense in reality.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> If you put something on the internet without protection (i.e. DRM), it is public This is a meaningless semantic punt to the word public. At the end of the day, there is a real debate around how ownership works in relation to AI.
- tdb7893 2y agoData being viewable but being subject to some restrictions isn't some new thing, it's how it has always worked. E.g. if I can view a website it's public but copying/pasting it somewhere else is a violation of copyright. We've never lived in a world where you can just do whatever you want with someone else's content and there's on fact a whole huge portion of the law around intellectual property for this exact sort of thing.