3 ms·
> "not whether or not" > > "doesn't mean that" > > "doesn't mean all" Your statements are not only convoluted, but dubious. And why the need to constantly sp
by knighthack 2y ago
> "not whether or not"
>
> "doesn't mean that"
>
> "doesn't mean all"
Your statements are not only convoluted, but dubious. And why the need to constantly speak in alternatives/negatives?
Here are statements that are easy to understand:
1) Finding funding is difficult for everyone.
2) Group affiliation does not inherently grant entitlement to funding or financial support.
3) If 'disproportionate funding' occurs, that's simply the reality of how resources are allocated. It doesn't necessarily allow you to claim racism or bigotry.
- meheleventyone 2y ago> If 'disproportionate funding' occurs, that's simply the reality of how resources are allocated Sure, that's just a tautological statement but it's pretty thought terminating to stop there and not consider if there are some factors involved in why they were allocated that way. I know this is a political football in the US but ignoring reality is a bad idea: https://www.polygon.com/24058266/video-game-industry-funding-gap https://www.polygon.com/24058266/video-game-industry-funding... https://www.washingtonpost.com/video-games/2022/01/31/black-game-developers-diversity-push-is-lots-talk-little-progress/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/video-games/2022/01/31/black-...