3 ms·
That's all fine, I am just talking about the emotional part of the debate and the ad hominems. They are uncalled and should not be tolerated. We had a colleag
by OtomotO 2y ago
That's all fine, I am just talking about the emotional part of the debate and the ad hominems.
They are uncalled and should not be tolerated.
We had a colleague in my last job that was good technician but nobody wanted to talk to him or ask for help or anything because frankly, he was an asshole.
- ksec 2y agoI listened to 3 min of it. And I don't see any emotional part of it. They simply have a fundamental difference of opinion. And I actually understand the C person is suggesting. Although may be he wasn't clear in explaining it. It is not the responsibility of C maintainer to spend additional time to explain their code. Especially in a way that Rust people understands. And may be in order for them to do that, without all the Rust context, they might as well learn Rust. And if Rust blinding is even set as a priority then all C maintainers would now have obligations, one way or another to work well with rust. Which neither does the C maintainers want to spend time on or have the interest to spend time on. The Rust people on the other hand saw their move as common good and want everyone to work together. Unfortunately most developers would only discover very late in their carrier, you can only make that happen when everyone 's interest are aligned.