> By that same logic, if you just use wait groups and mutexes correctly, you should also not worry about deadlocks and race conditions. I agree with most every

> By that same logic, if you just use wait groups and mutexes correctly, you should also not worry about deadlocks and race conditions. I agree with most everything else you said - especially about software being a trade off between specificity and expressiveness - but I can’t agree with this. The problem being that a mutex can hide things that a channel can’t. Channels will always give you what you expect, but that is not the case for mutexes or wait groups or error groups or whatever. Honestly, the older I get, the more I understand that joke about “you must be this tall to write concurrent programs” and the mark is at the ceiling.