4 ms·
Unlike many here, I never grokked or really liked WindowMaker. The biggest thing was how the dock icons were occupying too much precious screen space, and were
by AceJohnny2 2y ago
Unlike many here, I never grokked or really liked WindowMaker.
The biggest thing was how the dock icons were occupying too much precious screen space, and were distracting. Especially in the Olden Days when monitor ratios were 4:3. In contrast with a 16:9 or 16:10 modern monitor, where you can put things on the side and they'll be more out of focus.
Animated/informational dock icons, to show system stats or whatever, were more of a distraction than were worth it, and if you reduced the size of the dock icon then they became worthless. Couldn't have it both ways.
I did not like how big a dock icon was when you minimized a window. This was long after Windows 95 showed a thinner taskbar was perfectly sufficient.
I did not like the context menus that stuck around. Muscle memory, perhaps, but again: a distraction.
I did love its columnar file/tree navigator, which macOS continues to provide in Finder, although it's not a default!
All in all, it felt like an interesting exploration of the computer desktop UX space, but a dead end.
- dredmorbius 2y agoThe dock(s) and clip can be autohidden, expanding when hovered over. I've found this a useful compromise. (MacOS's dock can be configured ... somewhat ... similarly.)
- AceJohnny2 2y agoIndeed, I always configure the macOS dock to auto-hide. (I do not understand the people who don't and also leave it at the bottom of the screen rather than on the side. All that screen real-estate, wasted!)
- dredmorbius 2y agoThere are dozens of us side-hides! Dozens!