IANAL but I think for the specific dismissed claims in this specific case, reproduction is the issue, and it doesn't indicate anything about training. I think

IANAL but I think for the specific dismissed claims in this specific case, reproduction is the issue, and it doesn't indicate anything about training. I think it would be extremely hard to make claims against GitHub for training AI with code on GitHub, assuming GH has the typical "right to use data to improve service" clause that usually shows up on free-service EULAs.