These kind of articles remind me of the headlines of mainstream media when Covid started: "People who believe in the lableak theory are the same people who bel

These kind of articles remind me of the headlines of mainstream media when Covid started: "People who believe in the lableak theory are the same people who believe we never landed on the moon". Then give it about 18 months and the official tune becomes: "The lab-leak theory cannot be discarded". What about the coincidence where Peter Daszak was appointed as the sole US representative in the team investigating the origins of Covid-19? The conflict of interest. But we should just have accepted it as coincidence, right? Give it four years and Peter Daszak just lost his fundings (it's everywhere, Wikipedia has the links): "In May 2024, the United States Department of Health and Human Services suspended all federal funding for Daszak and the EHA, saying that he did not properly monitor research activities at the WIV and failed to report on their high-risk experiments. The department also began proceedings to permanently debar Daszak and the EHA from federal funding." Oh wow. So there was a conflict of interest after all? And he got defunded. And yet that person was the sole US scientist appointed to look into the origins of Covid-19? Actual investigative journalists did call that rat out from day one. But they were considered cracknuts. All coincidences. So before explaining us it's all "coincidences": please wait 18 months to a few years. Then we can talk. As a note to mainstream media: if you weren't so quick to spout up the official government propaganda, which is virtually always exposed as lies a few years later, people would be more willing to believe actual coincidences when they do happen.