4 ms·
What a blast from the past. WindowMaker served me well for many years, mainly on small screens. But once I started using multi-monitor setups, I switched to i3.
by v1ne 2y ago
What a blast from the past. WindowMaker served me well for many years, mainly on small screens. But once I started using multi-monitor setups, I switched to i3.
One thing: WindowMaker is easy to use yet full of options to customize the appearance and behaviour of windows, per-application and per-window.
Yet I think its killer feature for many years was the huge (64x64 pixel) "dock apps". There, you could put widgets with a ton of nice functionality, such as WiFi status, mailbox, disk monitoring — or just a clock.
I don't remember if NeXTStep/WM were the first to offer those widgets, but I remember being a fond user of them.
- bestham 2y agoThe wharf? Suddenly that name made sense when linking about the heritage and the dock. TIL I guess.
- Agingcoder 2y agoYep. I used windowmaker then enlightenment ( I fell prey to shiny baubles ) then kde3 ( yes, in my mind still the single best desktop environment I’ve ever used ), and now i3. I love i3.
- aryonoco 2y agoKDE3 will always be the pinnacle of Desktop Linux for me as well. The functionality that was there at the time is astounding. Kmail was better than Evolution (minus the Exchange support), KOffice was half decent and a lot more performant than OpenOffice. KDevelop was a quite progressive IDE. Heck even Konqueror was a decent browser, with an engine that was so well designed and portable, that when Apple decided to make a browser, they forked KHTML. Everything was cohesive, used a unified design language, worked great on a system with 1GB of RAM. I don't understand how all these years later, on systems infinitely more powerful, desktop Linux is yet to get to a similar state. KDE4 was such a disaster, I left KDE and have never really gone back since.
- notpushkin 2y agoIf you feel ever nostalgic, there's Trinity! https://www.trinitydesktop.org/ https://www.trinitydesktop.org/
- jraph 2y agoThe last versions of KDE 4 had fixed a lot of issues and were a solid DE IMHO. I had left KDE for a while when KDE 4 was first released indeed, but came back later. They decided they would not do the same mistake of releasing such unstable versions again in the future, and indeed, plasma 6.0 was usable since day one. Have you tried Plasma 6 or a recent plasma 5? If you liked KDE 3, you might like it. I find it's a really pleasant environment, I'm not sure something from KDE 3 is missing. It's also quite lightweight, I run it on a tablet with 1GB of RAM, it's a bit slow but quite usable. The web is pretty much unusable though for the most part unfortunately. There's also a big work of ironing out the small bugs and they are working on making things more cohesive with a design system and some work to unify qml-based and qtwidget-based components (yes, on that front, qml was not a thing when KDE 3 was released, the UI was probably more cohesive - though Breeze, KDE's theme, already does a lot for this and is beautiful). I don't know Trinity but that's of course another option.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- hulitu 2y ago> I don't understand how all these years later, on systems infinitely more powerful, desktop Linux is yet to get to a similar state. CADT ? They redesign the whole thing every couple of years instead of fixing bugs.
- throwaway89988 2y agoAnother vote for KDE3 as the best Linux desktop environment. I forgot how it was called, but one could easily automate the whole desktop back then via scripts and an interface to the KDE3 programs. KDE IMHO never returned to that level of polish and quality (yes, I tried 6). Today I am a GNOME user and its killer feature for me is provisioning via dconf and Evolution is my favorite email client on any platform.
- kombine 2y agoI only started using KDE 4, then quit and came back for KDE 5. Now I'm running KDE 6 on Wayland and it the most stable it ever has been. There is a significant push for bug fixing and polish. Port to Qt 6 started a major release cycle and I expect it to mature a lot in the next few releases.
- badsectoracula 2y agoI might be wrong, but i do not think NeXTStep had dockapps, i think the idea comes from older WMs which allowed X11 windows to be "swallowed" inside panels and Window Maker provided the same functionality in a NeXTStep-ish way (dockapps are just small windows nested inside a frame box around them). Actually at some point in recent years i used NeXTStep and having being using Window Maker for many years by that point, i felt a bit of an uncanny valley effect: what i was looking at the screen felt very familiar but still somewhat "wrong" and a ton of what i was used to didn't work (or worked in a different way) :-P. It made me realize what the people around the mid-2000s who tried various Aqua-like themes on GNOME 2, etc and said that it looks off/wrong were feeling like :-P. EDIT: also i think Window Maker is not the only window manager that supports/uses dockapps. I think FVWM and Afterstep can also use the same dockapps.
- HeckFeck 2y agoFluxbox also has first class support for Dockapps. They're a great pairing. An old screengrab to prove my point: https://www.thran.uk/img/desktop-aug-21.jpg https://www.thran.uk/img/desktop-aug-21.jpg. I'm especially fond of the VU-meter style ethernet traffic monitor, 'wmnd'. Find dockapps here: https://www.dockapps.net/ https://www.dockapps.net/
- bloopernova 2y agoThat screenshot makes me want to use Fluxbox, it looks great!
- kaeshiwaza 2y agoI use Fluxbox since the first version. Very easy to customize. I've just an issue with Firefox, the Firefox windows doesn't want to play with Fluxbox (on Debian)...
- folmar 2y agoI think this is a bug in upgrade path, I have my normal profile with this problem (and a lot of accumulated things) but if I launch Firefox with a fresh profile then it works nice.
- Reason077 2y agoFascinating to see WindowMaker still going strong. I was a keen fan back in the day (late 90s/early 2000s?). It had a nice feel to it and made my Linux desktop look cooler than the other Linux desktops in our open plan office on a university campus!
- bsdice 2y agoUsing i3 with rofi on X11 git version (because of new TearFree option) myself. A very thin top bar for virtual desktops, tray icons, email notifications, sound volume and date time is all that I need anymore. Tiling is the best way for me to use my single 32" monitor. The publication of high quality fonts since WindowMaker was a thing 25 years ago and expired patents for font rendering also needs to be mentioned. Desktop Linux has evolved nicely.