3 ms·
From the article it sounds like the plaintiffs were alleging that ChatGPT is effectively doing unauthorized duplication when it serves results that are extremel
by advisedwang 2y ago
From the article it sounds like the plaintiffs were alleging that ChatGPT is effectively doing unauthorized duplication when it serves results that are extremely similar or identical to the plaintiff's code. They aren't just alleging that reading their code = infringement like you seem to imply.
- paulddraper 2y agoI don't think the author was implying that. But yes, that is the charge.