If I'm understanding the article, the headline for it is terrible, because he is still absolutely detained, just the type of detention has changed from "police

If I'm understanding the article, the headline for it is terrible, because he is still absolutely detained, just the type of detention has changed from "police custody" to "enforced court appearance", which may well put him in a different type of legal detention ... so in no way is he "freed". Also: > The Kremlin said ... 'very serious' and warned ... Do any NATO members take Kremlin warnings seriously any more? It seems clear that the Russians will already do anything they think they can get away with (cf Skripal)