3 ms·
I look at source code and learn, and then sell my services for money. It's a very valid argument.
by danielmarkbruce 2y ago
I look at source code and learn, and then sell my services for money. It's a very valid argument.
- dgfitz 2y agoUh, no. Did you read what I said? Hell, did you read what you said? This response makes no sense whatsoever.
- danielmarkbruce 2y agoI'm basically an LLM. I trained in a similar way as the LLM, off of books and open source code, guessing what comes next, making errors, adjusting my brain. I make money the same way as the LLM, off of inference calls. Maybe you don't truly understand how an LLM works, or is trained, or how inference works. Or how humans work. Money goes out during training, money comes in during inference.
- dgfitz 2y agoI understand how they work. If you’re going to make bad-faith arguments, we can drop it here.
- danielmarkbruce 2y agoPointing out you are wrong isn't bad faith. Several people have noted in this thread that you've missed a pretty simple fact.
- dgfitz 2y agoYou claimed you’re “basically an LLM” so at this point it seems accurate. You’re mostly incorrect and spouting nonsense, nailed it!
- danielmarkbruce 2y agoMost don't consider making an analogy "bad faith". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analogy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analogy Even ChatGPT understands that money changes hands in both cases after training/learning: https://chatgpt.com/share/525aabbb-1fcc-4b1d-a88e-34206c8f5c2d https://chatgpt.com/share/525aabbb-1fcc-4b1d-a88e-34206c8f5c...
- anileated 2y ago> I look at source code and learn, and then sell my services for money. Footnote—in most developed countries (slavery exists). Human rights are great, aren’t they? Now, if you were, say, a tool that exclusively serves a human operator, this wouldn’t apply to you.