2 ms·
I'm not familiar with Rawhide so can't comment on that. > Debian Unstable (also known by its codename "Sid") is not a release, but rather the development versi
by cassianoleal 2y ago
I'm not familiar with Rawhide so can't comment on that.
> Debian Unstable (also known by its codename "Sid") is not a release, but rather the development version of the Debian distribution containing the latest packages that have been introduced into Debian.
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianUnstable#Introduction https://wiki.debian.org/DebianUnstable#Introduction
It's worth it reading the FAQ [0] before hopping on either, but as someone who's been running a mixed testing/unstable system for years, there's no reason for panic.
[0] https://wiki.debian.org/DebianUnstable#FAQ https://wiki.debian.org/DebianUnstable#FAQ
- ensignavenger 2y agoWhat I would love to see in the Debian ecosystem is a "Slowroll" release, similar to OpenSuse's upcoming "Slowroll" option. Maybe take Sid and make include any Sid packages that have been in it and stable for at least 2 weeks, and release an update every 30 days or so. Do some additional testing, backport any critical security fixes... sounds like a lot of work but it would be a valuable option.
- JoshTriplett 2y agoThat is mostly what testing does, modulo the exact numbers/durations involved. One reason people don't do snapshot-releases of testing is that such releases wouldn't get security support. And security support shouldn't wait 30 days.
- ensignavenger 2y agoWhich is why I explicitly mentioned security stuff being backported. Maybe it wasn't clear enough, but yes, I agree that security updates need to be released faster in many cases, and need a special handeling. The amount of work involved in handeling security patches is probably why it hasn't happened yet.