> Giving away 911 service isn't pushing anyone out of the telecom business. Irrelevant. My claim was about a free service replacing a paid one. 911 service in

> Giving away 911 service isn't pushing anyone out of the telecom business. Irrelevant. My claim was about a free service replacing a paid one. 911 service in the US is paid for by states and local governments, and telecoms must provide it to operate. Having a free option would create a disincentive to keep the status quo, and the paid service may be less upkept. > There is zero chance that the Starlink network would be abandoned and stop working if SpaceX went bankrupt Seems exceptionally naive. “Zero chance” alone is naive, there is substantial probability. But even if the satellites were kept in orbit by another owner, why would they continue to provide a free service at a cost? Even that question may be irrelevant, because non-profitable efforts would be ended by most restructurings. > Again, people are delusional to think that he would leave people to die on a whim Tesla’s exaggerated FSD claims are directly responsible for people’s deaths, including the Walter Huang case, where this negligence was established as a cause by plaintiff’s lawyers. You should double-check your arguments.