To clarify: what I meant was that Durov is as untrustworthy as Telegram's marketing is deceptive. i.e., the defaults are not private and secure, therefore it's

To clarify: what I meant was that Durov is as untrustworthy as Telegram's marketing is deceptive. i.e., the defaults are not private and secure, therefore it's prudent to suspect that his claims are false re free speech, being unbiased or not working for/with Russia. Hope this clears it up.