3 ms·

pretty much, the article doesn't take into account all factor. There is so more question you can ask until you end up having most question already answered. Th

pretty much, the article doesn't take into account all factor. There is so more question you can ask until you end up having most question already answered. The 'dated' user interface is irrelevant, people don't scroll it endlessly like they do on facebook. they come for question and answer, the ui is fast and well made for that purpose.

berkes 2y ago
> the ui is fast and well made for that purpose. The UX not so much though. There's so many x.stackexchange.com estates that often overlap (devops, serverfault, linux, askubuntu etc). The search is, and has always been, very poor to unusable. I've always just reverted to DDG or google to search stackoverflow. Having loads of answers and questions in a clean and fast UI is good, but if no-one can actually find the right Q and A, the overall "interface" is just outdated and poor. (Edit: related: I've always voiced the opinion that "duplicates" aren't solved with more or harder moderation, but with better search)