4 ms·
There was also a GTK package for Xamarin Forms which I've used https://github.com/xamarin/Xamarin.Forms/pkgs/nuget/Xamarin.Forms.Platform.GTK https://github.com
by SandyAndyPerth 2y ago
There was also a GTK package for Xamarin Forms which I've used
https://github.com/xamarin/Xamarin.Forms/pkgs/nuget/Xamarin.Forms.Platform.GTK https://github.com/xamarin/Xamarin.Forms/pkgs/nuget/Xamarin....
BUT
That's now officially unsupported as all of Xamarin Forms is no longer supported and the MAUI replacement doesn't cover Linux nor does that look likely (MAUI is mired deep in problems due over-ambition, failure to resource and it seems a significant push in MS to use MAUI Hybrid aka web UIs within native apps).
- pjmlp 2y agoI really don't get the push of Blazor everywhere instead of its original WebAssembly target. It is like the Web folks, that don't get anything else, are now pushing where .NET goes, mostly since .NET is now under Azure org chart. I have done Web and native since "forever", not everything has to be for everything.
- GoblinSlayer 2y agoYes, .net is for azure cloud webapps, that's how modern software is made. Then wrap them in electron to make them native.
- JoyrexJ9 2y agoI can't tell if this is sarcasm. I really hope it is
- FuriouslyAdrift 2y agoWebView2 would probably be the way to go, now... at least for Windows as the target. https://www.electronjs.org/blog/webview2/ https://www.electronjs.org/blog/webview2/
- pjmlp 2y agoEven the "port to WinUI" from UWP for the PhotosApp, is in similar vein, making use of Webview2 instead of native Windows. When Microsoft teams behave as such, why should we keep paying attention? For native Windows, Forms, WPF, and even MFC is way better in VS tooling than WinUI C++.