3 ms·

I question you "1 in 1M". I think it's probably multiple orders of magnitude more common that that. There is a continuum of how damaging that data leakage is, a

I question you "1 in 1M". I think it's probably multiple orders of magnitude more common that that. There is a continuum of how damaging that data leakage is, and/or who the data is flowing to. Just through personal anecdote, I can think of maybe 5 examples of people I directly know 'retaining' stuff like outlook email PSTs, training documents, etc. And I'm sure there are many more people in my immediate circle who have done similar stuff. The espionage situation is perhaps more rare, but still prevalent. It's a common situation for people to hang around outside the Foxconn campus soliciting data for the latest iphone / what-have-you. Lots of money to be made have a 2-3 month jumpstart on your competitors when you design a 3rd-party case, for example.

michaelmrose 2y ago
The more subtle the problems the more ridiculously poor the AI would be at catching it. I question the chances it will be any better at catching the fellow who comes back in with the AR than reasonable management. Insofar as catching people who are simply disloyal I would count it worthless. At best it might make a bad guess at which employees are presently upset or dissatisfied until it becomes obvious how to fake it by which time it has become easy to guess who hates you because living under the eye of sauron it will be 90% of your staff!