3 ms·
>...mentions or cites particular articles, papers, or books, it always lets the human know that it doesn’t have access to search or a database... I wonder if w
by samstave 2y ago
>...mentions or cites particular articles, papers, or books, it always lets the human know that it doesn’t have access to search or a database...
I wonder if we can create a "reverse Google" -- which is a RAG/Human Reinforcement GPT-pedia == Where we dump "confirmed real" information into it that is always current - and all LLMs are free to harvest directly from it in discernment of crafting responses.
For example - it could accept FireHose all current/active streams/podcasts of anything "live" and be like an AI-Tivo for any live streams and it can havea temporal windows that you cans search through "Show me every instance of [THING FROM ALL LIVE STREAMS WATCHED IN THE LAST 24 HOURS] - give me a markdown of the top channels, views, streams, comments - controversy, retweets regarding that topic. sort by time posted.
(Recall that HNer posting the "if youtube had channels:")
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41247023 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41247023
--
Remember when "Twitter give 'FireHose' directly to the Library of Congress!
Why not firehose GPT-to tha Tap Data'sset
https://www.forbes.com/sites/kalevleetaru/2017/12/28/the-library-of-congress-in-the-digital-age-from-archiving-twitter-to-innovation-lab/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/kalevleetaru/2017/12/28/the-lib...