4 ms·
> I'm going to argue that tests are actually free. > The alternative to automated testing is manual testing, not no testing. Actually, unit tests have differe
by wtetzner 14y ago
> I'm going to argue that tests are actually free.
> The alternative to automated testing is manual testing, not no testing.
Actually, unit tests have different costs than manual testing. That doesn't make them free. For example, with unit tests, you now have more (possibly buggy) code to maintain.
- dllthomas 14y ago> For example, with unit tests, you now have more (possibly buggy) code to maintain. Well, that's no problem. Just hit them with a bunch of unit tests...