4 ms·

I’m honestly shocked more “assemble in orbit” type mission structures haven’t been proposed. Falcon Heavy is just so convenient yet ignored.

• JumpCrisscross 2y ago
  > shocked more “assemble in orbit” type mission structures haven’t been proposed It's unprecedented. A large part of Startship's technical risk in the Artemis programme is in-orbit refuelling. That said, if IFT-5 or 6 can demonstrated recapture and an in-orbit fuelling attempt is made in 2025 that doesn't end catastrophically, I think the centre of mass of technical risk for Artemis shifts away from the novel fucking launch vehicle system that SpaceX has been tasked with building from the ground up to checks notes a rocket based on refurbished Space Shuttle engines and double checks this glorified launch tower.
• baq 2y ago
  Falcon Heavy has the thrust and the delta v, but it doesn’t have the fairing volume. Basically anything interesting that fits can be launched by smaller vehicles. Starship will be a game changer in the most literal sense here as long as they figure out payload doors…