4 ms·
A 3840x2160 jpeg image at 100% quality is somewhere between 2 and 3 MB, so 15 models makes 45 MB, still way short of + 300 MB for the app.
by RedShift1 2y ago
A 3840x2160 jpeg image at 100% quality is somewhere between 2 and 3 MB, so 15 models makes 45 MB, still way short of + 300 MB for the app.
- maccard 2y ago2.5MB is about an order of magnitude larger than the OP's hundreds of KB. I'd be fine with 3MB. But they should still be pulled on demand.
- arghwhat 2y agoJPEG at 100% quality makes very little sense - the goal is to dial it down to the lowest value where artifacts are still low enough to not notice. AVIF also has much better behavior in the artifact department, letting you go much lower without introducing artifacts - you simply loose detail, which is no issue in a largely smooth product photo. For reference, my own photos downscaled to 3840x2560 AVIF for sharing purposes range from 500KB to 2MB depending on how "busy" the image is. The off-camera 6000x4000 JPEG is ~7MB in comparison. I stand by my opinion that a few hundred KB per image is plenty at the required resolution for model photos in an app.
- vel0city 2y ago> The largest is `Sonos_M9_rose` at 7.8 MB So only twice the size of your JPEG example. Looking at the area chart of the files, it looks like the majority of the assets are less than that 2-3MB. https://xcancel.com/pic/orig/media%2FGWAYmxabsAApjwu.png https://xcancel.com/pic/orig/media%2FGWAYmxabsAApjwu.png There's probably over 200 or so assets in that 233MB archive.