4 ms·

Could have used some more precise language w.r.t. Trump "disappearing" from the public eye (there was commentary about it at the time, the usual take being that

Could have used some more precise language w.r.t. Trump "disappearing" from the public eye (there was commentary about it at the time, the usual take being that he was happy to just sit back and let Biden & the Dems self detonate, a single rally during the period in question doesn't change this), or the media coverage (Butler was CNN's first live broadcast of a rally). What the media said about why they were broadcasting the rally is just that, a statement, and it may or may not be aligned with the actual truth (or even understanding of the people making the statement). "The Secret Service repositions" people all the time" is just a banal and unhelpful statement of fact, which dodges the peculiar effect of this particular repositioning in both effect (more visibility for the photographers, less for the crowd/spectators) and timing. I'm in no way obligated to establish that the SS "never repositions people" in order to argue that this is suspicious. These don't constitute "lies," nor do they excuse your underhanded attempt to dismiss the rest of the list of facts as false (probably because they are indeed quite improbable).

jasonlotito 2y ago
I like how you dismiss the lie to change it completely when someone does what you ask and verifies your claim. So much backpedaling. You made a bold claim. It was 100% wrong. Talk about underhanded, I’m not the one lying and then changing my story. And the media story counters your baseless supposition that it was mysterious as to why the media would start paying attention to him. It was the first rally in a while and it makes sense that they might think he’s there to announce his running mate. I’ve provided evidence. Put up some of your own that say exactly what you are saying, liar.
- cempaka 2y ago
  "the media _said_ why they were covering the rally, checkmate and QED good sir" lol just pathetic This is the same set of institutions that insisted from January 6, 2021 until about June of this year that Trump was a literal existential threat to democracy who had attempted to carry out an actual insurrection, and needed to be completely deplatformed. Now, all of a sudden deciding to cover his campaign like it's just one more ordinary old POTUS horse race. Okay.

jasonlotito 2y ago

I like how you dismiss the lie to change it completely when someone does what you ask and verifies your claim. So much backpedaling. You made a bold claim. It was 100% wrong. Talk about underhanded, I’m not the one lying and then changing my story. And the media story counters your baseless supposition that it was mysterious as to why the media would start paying attention to him. It was the first rally in a while and it makes sense that they might think he’s there to announce his running mate. I’ve provided evidence. Put up some of your own that say exactly what you are saying, liar.

cempaka 2y ago
"the media _said_ why they were covering the rally, checkmate and QED good sir" lol just pathetic This is the same set of institutions that insisted from January 6, 2021 until about June of this year that Trump was a literal existential threat to democracy who had attempted to carry out an actual insurrection, and needed to be completely deplatformed. Now, all of a sudden deciding to cover his campaign like it's just one more ordinary old POTUS horse race. Okay.