5 ms·
Just to check my understanding, the novel part of this is the fact that it generates it from two pictures from any camera without custom hand-calibration for th
by teqsun 2y ago
Just to check my understanding, the novel part of this is the fact that it generates it from two pictures from any camera without custom hand-calibration for that particular camera, and everything else involved is existing technology?
- vessenes 2y agoGood question! “Existing technology” is doing a lot of work here, enough that I would say no. To get splats out of photos generally requires many calibrated photos all of which include highly accurate placement and orientation data attached. Like ideally cm-accurate 6 degree, plus as you mention calibration. There are some pipelines that infer this data, and there is some work showing that models can be trained to do well with fuzzy/inaccurate position information. But they still would want like 30 photos + to do that desk demo video justice and look good. Splatt3R (sigh on typing that name, geez) is a very different architecture, in that it’s a transformer model which is trained to ‘know’ about the world, and takes two (only) photos, combines that with its trained-in world knowledge, and hallucinates (infers) a set of Gaussians that it believes are a sort of plausible continuation from those two photos.