> a man on campus is more qualified to be there than a woman I am not sure that "talented and impressive" is the metric by which we should be admitting studen

> a man on campus is more qualified to be there than a woman I am not sure that "talented and impressive" is the metric by which we should be admitting students into higher education. On the contrary, I submit that we should be admitting the least impressive candidates who can matriculate in order to "train our weaknesses." Women's disenfranchisement has long been a hand tied behind our back, and it's high time that we free ourselves to be maximally productive.