4 ms·
With what money? Correct me if I'm wrong here, but it sounds like they are already paying them to under-produce. So why not just pay them to produce the exces
by CharlieDigital 2y ago
With what money?
Correct me if I'm wrong here, but it sounds like they are already paying them to under-produce. So why not just pay them to produce the excess and then...do something with it? Sell it to other countries, donate it as humanitarian aid to areas like Gaza, Ukraine, etc.
- alephnerd 2y ago> but it sounds like they are already paying them to under-produce Not as much as if they were subsidizing the cost directly. In this case the loss is on the consumer's end.