4 ms·
Zuckerberg vs trump, would also pretty much be Facebook vs x
by wodenokoto 2y ago
Zuckerberg vs trump, would also pretty much be Facebook vs x
- chrisco255 2y agoTrump's not going to be able to run for a third term.
- reaperducer 2y agoTrump's not going to be able to run for a third term. He says he won the last election, so he's already running for a third term.
- mensetmanusman 2y agoHe didn’t have a second term, even if it’s true social media was censored to help his opponent.
- artificialLimbs 2y ago[flagged]
- blue_dragon 2y agoCan you please cite the court case that proves Trump won in 2020? Regardless of how many people believe that the Democrats cheated, asserting that Trump won AND that his alleged victory was proven in court is quite a bold claim. Post proof or gtfo.
- wodenokoto 2y agoHarris can still win.
- FireBeyond 2y agoWell, he's also on video recently at a church saying, "I need you to come out and vote for me. And if things work out the way we want, you won't need to vote again."
- zo1 2y agoApparently this is the smoking gun and Trump is going to become dictator for life? Is this where we are in the debate? You might as well be talking about what kind of ice-cream he likes then.
- LunaSea 2y agoYou mean the level of debate where people take a candidate's word into account. Yes, what a silly thing to do.
- arandomusername 2y agoCome on, we both know that he means (specially if you read the full context) that there will be no reason to vote afterwards (to a group that seldom votes) because their wishes/goals will be delievered by trump. He was just trying to convince them that this election matters most.
- FireBeyond 2y ago> to a group that seldom votes Seniors and church-goers? Citation needed. > He was just trying to convince them that this election matters most. Sure. And he said he was going to "act as a dictator from day 1" (after saying repeatedly that "America could benefit from a dictatorship" and praising what other dictators "have been able to do for their country") for what reason? He said he'd terminate the constitution. The guy who just got indicted again for his BS on and around Jan 6. Really, he just means "I'll fix the country so well, and there will be so much love, that people will be happy to keep voting us back in". I don't think he'll succeed. I don't think he'll be elected. But if you think there's not a part of Trump that wants to be President For Life, and will if he thinks he can get away with it, then ... you haven't been listening to him.
- NickC25 2y agoHe's also against the 1st and 2nd Amendments. >Really, he just means "I'll fix the country so well, and there will be so much love, that people will be happy to keep voting us back in". No, it means exactly as Trump said it would - he wants to be a dictator, and is willing to terminate the constitution to make it so. Even then, he won't fix jack shit, because that would actually require working, which is something he cannot and will not do. He had a supermajority in congress in his first term...and did nothing besides pass tax cuts for billionaires. I'd never in my youth imagine that the country I grew up in would elect a guy who trashes the constitution who wears lifts and orange makeup, let alone potentially doing it twice. May you live in interesting times indeed.
- kredd 2y agoFacebook has insane pull. Sometimes I forget about it, but it is used by majority of every single demographic base once you consider different portions of the FB app (markets, groups, messenger), Instagram, WhatsApp and Threads (don’t think it is that relevant yet). That being said, to my understanding, Meta has been trying to move itself away from political-adjacent conversations. While Twitter is completely the opposite, and thrives on poli-rage.