> Other types of pollution are much harder to track I was trying to explain to you why I find radioactive pollution unacceptable, replying by telling me that t

> Other types of pollution are much harder to track I was trying to explain to you why I find radioactive pollution unacceptable, replying by telling me that there are worse types of pollution does not really add to the discussion. You seem hell-bent on making this discussion into one about choosing the lesser evil. But the article is about the exact opposite - it's about getting out of that cycle and investing in a true alternative. > Pollution from other energy sources also causes cancer, and causes more of it than nuclear power. Nuclear power gets the headlines, sure, but the day to day poison is everything else. I find wind turbines to cause very little cancer. > When I said "people like" I meant "people opposed to nuclear power", which you are (seem to be), and therefor you are like them. No, I understand that, but why do you want them off your lawn? By their opposition to nuclear they automatically made the air worse and cause pollution action days? Strikes me as a tad simplistic.