2 ms·
I don't think that works though and here's why. Suppose I live on $2k/month with one kid, and I choose to live somewhere rural where this can actually work. S
by einhverfr 14y ago
I don't think that works though and here's why.
Suppose I live on $2k/month with one kid, and I choose to live somewhere rural where this can actually work. So I bring in approx $24k after business expenses, and in the end I end up getting a little more back from taxes than I pay via the EIC. Suppose I like this life.
Suppose I could go to work for BigCo Inc and make $130k/year. You wouldn't say my business is losing $100k/year. That would be silly.
- its_so_on 14y agoExactly. We are in total agreement. The argument, most posters here, and the parent who I responded to disagrees with us. They're wrong and you and I are right. If your business gets to use your labor for "free" just because you happen to be a 100% owner, it is no different from Facebook getting to use employee's at 30% of market rates because, collectively, they own 6% of the company. It's exactly the same thing. The article and people who defend it are very wrong. You're right.
- einhverfr 14y agoI misread you. Sorry. We are in total agreement.