Summary: > the AI algorithm correctly predicted 70% of earthquakes a week before they happened during a seven-month trial > The outcome was a weekly forecast

Summary: > the AI algorithm correctly predicted 70% of earthquakes a week before they happened during a seven-month trial > The outcome was a weekly forecast in which the AI successfully predicted 14 earthquakes within about 200 miles of where it estimated they would happen > It missed one earthquake and gave eight false warnings. So about 36% are false positives (which aren't terrible in this particular field) and about 6% false negatives. This doesn't sound bad, but I'd love to know the precision of previous techniques / prior art.