3 ms·
That's uh. I dunno how to tell ya this Walter. Coming your way in Unicode 16.0... Allow me to introduce: BOTTOM LEFT JUSTIFIED UPPER RIGHT QUARTER BLACK CIRCL
by samatman 2y ago
That's uh. I dunno how to tell ya this Walter.
Coming your way in Unicode 16.0...
Allow me to introduce: BOTTOM LEFT JUSTIFIED UPPER RIGHT QUARTER BLACK CIRCLE!
https://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/Unicode-16.0/U160-1FB00.pdf https://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/Unicode-16.0/U160-1FB00.p...
But wait! There's more! U+1CC31, UPPER CENTRE LEFT TWELFTH CIRCLE! And you best believe there's 11 more.
https://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/Unicode-16.0/U160-1CC00.pdf https://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/Unicode-16.0/U160-1CC00.p...
- Joker_vD 2y agoI personally like getting more terminal-oriented ideographical symbols in the Unicode; what I don't like is yet another font variation for the basic Latin alphabet. Oh well.
- zamadatix 2y agoI think there comes a point we should just embrace sixels so you can draw whatever it is you want to be shown in a character cell. That point is usually somewhere around here where it's "sure, I can copy it as normal text data but is it actually going to look like anything like it's supposed in a normal font anyways?". Even Windows is getting support for sixels now.
- WalterBright 2y agogag me with a spoon