2 ms·
It would be interesting to know how this could be less innovative and still have had a chance to work. From my perspective, the point was the software. Getting
by jdboyd 2y ago
It would be interesting to know how this could be less innovative and still have had a chance to work.
From my perspective, the point was the software. Getting that software to markets with unreliable electricity and little money would have been a problem without a new type of hardware device. In the end though, it was the hardware that dominated the consciousness, which was too bad. OTOH, if they hadn't tried, that might mean something like 2+ million kids might have had a worse education (assuming that the OLPC machines were useful to their education), so I doubt it is fair to call it a failure.
It definitely wasn't aimed at US or European mainstream success, nor was it even really offered in those markets, so lack of success in those markets is expected.