3 ms·
> Open source really needs something like the CC-BY-NC-ND* license. That seems akin to saying "vegan food really needs pork", since by definition a NC licence
by RobotToaster 2y ago
> Open source really needs something like the CC-BY-NC-ND* license.
That seems akin to saying "vegan food really needs pork", since by definition a NC licence can't be open source. Not to mention such licences cause as many, if not more, problems than they solve.
https://community.oscedays.org/t/why-are-non-commercial-licenses-not-open-source/569 https://community.oscedays.org/t/why-are-non-commercial-lice...
- lowkey 2y agoNotably the open source foundation tried and failed to trademark the term open source in 1999. As such “by definition a NC license can’t be open source” is true only by certain definitions. Open source is a generic term, not owned by the OSI, despite the holy wars fought over it. I realize my post is controversial and may spur vitriol from some. It is an uncomfortable truth for many.
- RobotToaster 2y ago"Vegan" isn't trademarked either, but has a generally acknowledged meaning, just as open source has a generally acknowledged meaning of meeting the OSI open source definition.