2 ms·
So, if I'm understanding what you're saying: The article is referring to a sector of the economy that is essentially undefinable and using statistics they someh
by lolinder 2y ago
So, if I'm understanding what you're saying: The article is referring to a sector of the economy that is essentially undefinable and using statistics they somehow derived about that undefinable sector to argue that San Francisco is the center of said undefinable sector.
Do I have that right?
(If so, this is not reassuring me that their cited statistics are in any way meaningful.)
- paxys 2y agoYou can use any definition you want and argue semantics all day long. The conclusion is still going to be that Silicon Valley is the center of the global tech industry and where most talent is concentrated and where most new innovation is happening.
- lolinder 2y agoIf you create special definitions for "global tech industry" and "talent" and "innovation" specifically in order to arrive at that result, absolutely! Meanwhile, those of us in the 90% of US developers and 99% of worldwide developers will keep on innovating and building new stuff regardless of the semantic games you want to play to keep your Bay-centric worldview.