3 ms·
The story's potentially neat and interesting, but for how many times it's been republished in mearly identical fashion across many mainstream outlets, there's
by brailsafe 2y ago
The story's potentially neat and interesting, but for how many times it's been republished in mearly identical
fashion across many mainstream outlets, there's doesn't seem to be a reference to a DOI or first-party source? I'm fine with having "matching" footprints have a different level of standard for geological time contexts, but give me something to read pls.
- drjasonharrison 2y agooriginal paper with source: https://smu.app.box.com/s/e2ghm8ycjb1zf6hu9pooypdl4sosylbn https://smu.app.box.com/s/e2ghm8ycjb1zf6hu9pooypdl4sosylbn I agree that online "click bait" science websites parrot the same content...google found the original paper though.
- brailsafe 2y agoty, I actually wasn't able to find it by searching