> There is a person responsible and can be creative as to how he creates the report. But if there is something wrong with the report, he would be responsible sa

> There is a person responsible and can be creative as to how he creates the report. But if there is something wrong with the report, he would be responsible same as if he wrote the report himself. What does "responsible" mean here? How good are we currently at holding police "responsible" for incorrect reports? This seems like a moral hazard. I believe most police officers want to be good people, and since writing a truthful report by hand is easier than writing a lie (why bother making up a lie?) most reports are truthful. But, if a LLM makes it easier to just fill in bullshit--and LLMs are very very good at filling in bullshit, if nothing else--then there is a moral hazard. Police will have a personal incentive to allow LLM fluff in their reports.