6 ms·
One thing to understand is that, for home computers, the processing power was nearly free, but the storage (RAM and disk) were brutally expensive. An 8 or 16-b
by aidenn0 2y ago
One thing to understand is that, for home computers, the processing power was nearly free, but the storage (RAM and disk) were brutally expensive. An 8 or 16-bit home-computer from the early '80s could execute more instructions per second than a PDP-10 from 10-15 years ago, but had less RAM (Most 8-bit systems had no more than 64k, and the original IBM 5150 maxed out at 256k[1]) and was probably limited to a cassette or floppy disk for storage (no hard drive).
So when you see e.g. demos of SymbOS[2] running on an MSX2 (which at 1985 barely qualifies as "early 80s") with a 1MB ram expansion, it's not really the sort of thing that people would have had at home in the early 80s.
1: The PC was offered in configurations as low as 16k, models with less than 64k were fairly quickly discontinued.
2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SymbOS https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SymbOS
- tourmalinetaco 2y agoI always feel hardware upgrades that aren’t realistic to the time are in a way “cheating” when working on older machines. Definitely cool, but far cooler to fit in your features in using the original limitations.
- aidenn0 2y agoWell "realistic" is always the question. If you paid $10k you could get a very beefy machine throughout the '80s, or you could get a new car.