> Even the US's Constitution interpretation is up to the courts when questions arise, that's the courts' job anyhow. Judicial review of the constitutionality o

> Even the US's Constitution interpretation is up to the courts when questions arise, that's the courts' job anyhow. Judicial review of the constitutionality of laws is itself an invention of the courts, in fact. (And probably a good idea, but it’s something the courts had to decide they had, not a role or power plain in the law). So that specific thing being their job is… something they decided was their job, which is kinda funny.