> certain governments have laws in place that allows them access to any data in their territory. This explanation makes sense, but assuming "certain government

> certain governments have laws in place that allows them access to any data in their territory. This explanation makes sense, but assuming "certain governments" includes the US then the remedy isn't stronger laws in the US, it's weaker laws—it means that the US was the first to break the borderless internet and it needs to rewrite its laws to be border-agnostic.