2 ms·
> If i'm not mistaken, because of this (via[0]) >> The CLOUD Act primarily... As far as I understand (IANAL) the CLOUD Act has not been used as basis of decis
by buzer 2y ago
> If i'm not mistaken, because of this (via[0])
>> The CLOUD Act primarily...
As far as I understand (IANAL) the CLOUD Act has not been used as basis of decision at least for Schrems II. The primary issues court found were regarding surveillance programs authorized under Section 702 of the FISA & executive order 12333.
Full Schrems II judgement is available at https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=228677&pageIndex=0&doclang=en&mode=lst&dir=&occ=first&part=1&cid=12312155 https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&do...
- judge2020 2y agoThat makes more sense then. Is it still right to say that they're afraid of a US company being compelled to access data at the request of the US gov when it's stored in the EU, or is it still only trying to avoid EU data actually going to the US during _regular_ operations of a business (paragraph 63)? I feel like it's still a threat if some US employee could access servers inside the EU as a one-off for NSA/etc surveillance?