3 ms·
> There was some minimal quality loss, of course, but it was completely irrelevant in the big picture But then the solutions are not comparable anymore, are th
by jraph 2y ago
> There was some minimal quality loss, of course, but it was completely irrelevant in the big picture
But then the solutions are not comparable anymore, are they? Would a lossless codec instead have improved speed?
- chupasaurus 2y agoH.264 has lossless mode.
- Sesse__ 2y agoNo, because I had hardware H.264 encoder support. :-) (The decoding in FFmpeg on the other side was still software. But it was seemingly much cheaper to do a H.264 software decode.)