3 ms·

> but at least the UI it's miles ahead on responsiveness. One Lisp REPL doing stuff and GNU Emacs is completely dead as long as the Lisp REPL runs that Emacs L

by lispm 2y ago

> but at least the UI it's miles ahead on responsiveness. One Lisp REPL doing stuff and GNU Emacs is completely dead as long as the Lisp REPL runs that Emacs Lisp code. It's not even slow, it just is completely non-responsive.

medstrom 2y ago
This seems a bug in the design of that REPL. Unless there's some reason the process has to be the same as the editor process.
- lispm 2y ago
  I want multiple Lisp REPLs which run Lisp code concurrently in the same Lisp process. How would I do it in GNU Emacs?
  - medstrom 2y ago
    The first question is why. Can you not use CL repls instead of elisp repls?
    - lispm 2y ago
      I would want to hack Emacs Lisp, not Common Lisp.
  - deleted 2y ago
    [deleted]