2 ms·
That's an imaginary simplicity since there is no such thing: determining a subset requires very high certainty in the rules (to be able to apply them and not ru
by eviks 2y ago
That's an imaginary simplicity since there is no such thing: determining a subset requires very high certainty in the rules (to be able to apply them and not run afoul), which doesn't exist in any real legal system
- MichaelZuo 2y agoHence why every company with sizeable operations in multiple jurisdictions has a huge team of lawyers…? No HN comment is ever going into the same depth as the output of a hundred plus lawyers. But the parent points in the right general direction.
- eviks 2y agoNever heard a joke about 2 lawyers = 3 opinions? That one points in the right general direction, which is the opposite of the parent's one
- m2024 2y agoThey just needed to remove the CP and none of this would be happening.
- eviks 2y agoThis doesn't even pass the smell test of their actual charges