The question is about the abstraction being understandable and predictable. All the examples you have follow that, LLMs throw that out of the window. >> Scratc

The question is about the abstraction being understandable and predictable. All the examples you have follow that, LLMs throw that out of the window. >> Scratch that, I guess you're not using a modern microprocessor to generate microcode from a higher-level instruction set either? Hell, I design gate level logic -> map it to instructions -> use them in C for the very LLMs and can fully understand[0] every aspect of it (if it doesn't behave as expected, that is a bug) but I cannot fathom or predict how the LLMs behave when i use them even though I know their architecture and implementation. [0] Admittedly I treat the tools I use during the process, like cad tools, compiler, as black boxes, however I know that if I want to or the need arises, I can debug/understand them.