3 ms·

Yeah, uh WHICH employees? Because Boeing is not an engineering led company. It is a bunch of scum sucking MBAs that attached themselves to a once-successful co

Yeah, uh WHICH employees? Because Boeing is not an engineering led company. It is a bunch of scum sucking MBAs that attached themselves to a once-successful company and undermined any engineering focus, professionalism, and ethics from the entire management chain. We're talking about a company that has murdered whistleblowers in all likelihood: https://slate.com/technology/2024/05/boeing-deaths-whistleblowers-suicide-rumors-foul-play.html https://slate.com/technology/2024/05/boeing-deaths-whistlebl... This is a fundamentally amoral and corrupt company that should have executives in criminal jail.

SapporoChris 2y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Barnett_(whistleblower)#Death https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Barnett_(whistleblower)#D... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Barnett_(whistleblower)#Conspiracy_theories https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Barnett_(whistleblower)#C... I can't embrace conspiracy theories.
- AtlasBarfed 2y ago
  I embrace statistics. Two whistleblowers, two premature deaths.
  - SapporoChris 2y ago
    Good statistics starts with good data. There have been more than 12 whistleblowers by my count. https://fortune.com/2024/05/09/more-boeing-whistleblowers-emerge-law-firm/ https://fortune.com/2024/05/09/more-boeing-whistleblowers-em...
    - AtlasBarfed 2y ago
      Per your original link, 10 appeared after the two deaths. Let's give me a little bit of conspiratorial leeway Boeing clearly knew they had a big organizational problem. So they tried to intimidate the first two to dissuade more whistleblowing Unfortunately the opposite happened. You and I both know that they're not going to expedite the deaths of another 10 whistleblowers appearing after the first two die. Then the heat will seriously be on. I'll even grant you the second death was good old medical incompetence The first death however is a classic CIA suicide. Quick short note, gunshot to head, other associated evidence. And yet, why did he repark to a more remote location? Maybe it's shame, but it also suspiciously aligns with an assassin moving the target to a less monitored location.

SapporoChris 2y ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Barnett_(whistleblower)#Death https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Barnett_(whistleblower)#D... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Barnett_(whistleblower)#Conspiracy_theories https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Barnett_(whistleblower)#C... I can't embrace conspiracy theories.

AtlasBarfed 2y ago
I embrace statistics. Two whistleblowers, two premature deaths.
- SapporoChris 2y ago
  Good statistics starts with good data. There have been more than 12 whistleblowers by my count. https://fortune.com/2024/05/09/more-boeing-whistleblowers-emerge-law-firm/ https://fortune.com/2024/05/09/more-boeing-whistleblowers-em...
  - AtlasBarfed 2y ago
    Per your original link, 10 appeared after the two deaths. Let's give me a little bit of conspiratorial leeway Boeing clearly knew they had a big organizational problem. So they tried to intimidate the first two to dissuade more whistleblowing Unfortunately the opposite happened. You and I both know that they're not going to expedite the deaths of another 10 whistleblowers appearing after the first two die. Then the heat will seriously be on. I'll even grant you the second death was good old medical incompetence The first death however is a classic CIA suicide. Quick short note, gunshot to head, other associated evidence. And yet, why did he repark to a more remote location? Maybe it's shame, but it also suspiciously aligns with an assassin moving the target to a less monitored location.