3 ms·

Taykh = river, as in Yez 47,12/nathaniel silber (shtetl = … ) Tonton = pork (osaka slang) So, an algebraic exercise for me, a geometric one for you, and a qua

• 082349872349872 2y ago
  Geometric, or even philosophical? Do I understand correctly that if we were to attempt to explain Kolmogorov Sophistication to Aristotle, we would say "the sophistication of `x` is the smallest essence over all proper[0] descriptions of x by, first[1] its essence, and then[2] its specific accidents"? Intuitively, this would make sense, because as glass bead game players we are drawn to (beads whose cane was also formed from)* beads. As Körner would say, the height of distinction for a mathematician is to have, not an eponymous theorem, but an eponymous lemma. [0] I don't understand what constitutes a proper description here yet, but am currently assuming it has to do with lying on a subsumption frontier, otherwise the trivial model would always be minimal. [1] I think this has to be noncommutative, for otherwise we'd waste description bits on labelling the accidents? Compare canonical Huffman. (.a Lojban) [2] see also Linnaeus
  • gradschoolfail 2y ago
    [0] not sure what you (or I, even) mean here, would the earlier bead of ultrafilters (& ultrametrics) be relevant in dispelling your discomfort? [1] yes [2] Linnaeus?
    • 082349872349872 2y ago
      [2] Nomenclature binomiale (compare the "biped, featherless — with broad nails")