> due to climate changes there is already and there will be no room for cities and trains. This idea is simply stupid, for lack of a nicer word. Seriously stu

> due to climate changes there is already and there will be no room for cities and trains. This idea is simply stupid, for lack of a nicer word. Seriously stupid. You think having everyone live in suburbs and drive everywhere is better for the climate? Really, really stupid. > I'm pretty sure most trains in Japan are not self-propelled for all wagons, as in the EU. Again you're totally clueless. All passenger trains here have self-propelled cars. Locomotives are only used for freight trains. >too much for high-resource intensive big stuff like cities. Again, this shows you stupid you are. Cities use fewer resources per person than any other lifestyle: smaller homes, shared walls, less motorized transport all add up to far less resource consumption. Of course, idiotic rural Americans don't see it that way because they can't imagine a world without big gas-guzzling trucks to drive around in and just see the large number of people in cities without being able to think about anything in a per-capita sense. >A notorious tract of any dictatorship notoriously ending in deep sufferance and disruption. Cars are needed because collective transportation means can't substitute them, BUT, cars can substitute collective transportation means, that's why a SANE economy choose to ditch other transportation means. Ok you're obviously a complete lunatic. I give up.