5 ms·
Hmm, I wonder how effective that would be. My small home's ventilation system is currently taking in about 100m³ of fresh air per hour. That's about 1600L/minut
by elric 2y ago
Hmm, I wonder how effective that would be. My small home's ventilation system is currently taking in about 100m³ of fresh air per hour. That's about 1600L/minute. Let's assume the intake duct is about 20cm in diameter, and assume we can place a bulb to illuminate a 50cm stretch of pipe. That's a volume of about 16 liters. So the air would be in visible range of the bulb for about half a second. Would that be enough for a UV bulb to do anything?
This was back of napkin maths, could be way off.
Edit: sanitizing incoming air is probably pretty useless, as the outdoor concentration of pathogens is likely very low to begin with.
- thelastparadise 2y agoLow in pathogens, maybe, but high in pollutants such as diesel particulates, second hand cannabis, wildfire emissions, etc.
- thedougd 2y agoNo, not enough exposure time. I’ve seen some claims that it can destroy viruses on some medium. Imagine a filter in the light catching virus particles or particles that have viruses. The light destroys them while they’re stuck in place. I would need some independent testing to verify that claim.